Author |
Topic: Chinese Bush Warbler(?) (Read 686 times) |
|
Griffin
BBS Member BBS God
    

Gender: 
Posts: 139
|
 |
Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 10:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Subject: Chinese Bush Warbler(?) Female(?) Cettia canturians Location: KFBG Date: October-18-2003. EOS 10D, EF300mm f/2.8 L USM, EF2x II TC, f/8, ISO400. We encountered this hungry little bird on our way down. It was too busy feeding itself so we can get some what "close". Nonetheless, the photographs below are cropped >50% and are definitely of no artistic value. Thanks for viewing. Griffin.
|
« Last Edit: May 28th, 2004, 2:30pm by BBS Moderators » |
Logged |
|
|
|
Albatross
BBS Member BBS Junior Member
 

I believe I can fly
Gender: 
Posts: 19
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #1 on: Oct 23rd, 2003, 8:47pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hi Griffin, Would you mind to tell why you suggested they are Manchurian (Chinese) Bush Warblers? AB
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Griffin
BBS Member BBS God
    

Gender: 
Posts: 139
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #2 on: Oct 23rd, 2003, 9:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Just wild guess. That is why I leave a question mark. I would be grateful if you could give me an idea. TIA. Griffin.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
miket
BBS Member BBS God
    
 I'd rather be birding!
Posts: 257
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #3 on: Oct 24th, 2003, 9:01am » |
Quote Modify
|
This is a not Manchurian/Chinese Bush Warbler Cettia canturians (officially referred to in HK as Japanese Bush Warbler Cettia diphone), on the basis of general coloration, amongst other things - richer brown in JBW, with a distinctly browner crown, usually. What it is, I think, is a phylloscopus warbler of the Dusky/Radde's/Yellow-streaked group. Since we record hundreds or thousands of Duskies for every Radde's recorded and about 100 times that for every Yellow-streaked, and since there has been massive passage of Duskies through HK in the last ten days or so, you have to look for something to suggest they are not Duskies. Actually, what we can see of supercilium shape (broad + diffuse in front of the eye, fine and well-defined behind the eye) + bill depth + impression of greener tone to plumage (classic features), + duskiness below, suggestion of pale panel in wing (things I've frequently observed) suggest this may well be a Radde's Warbler P. schwarzi. Legs look strong too, but you'd expect to see rusty-buff undertail coverts, which this bird doesn't seem to have. Did you note a call? This is crucial. Having said all that and looked again at picture 2 it has occurred to me that it just could be a very worn Arctic Warbler, but it seems very unlikely from Pic 1 - I assume they are the same bird. Mike Turnbull
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Griffin
BBS Member BBS God
    

Gender: 
Posts: 139
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #4 on: Oct 24th, 2003, 2:50pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Thank you for your kind help. Both pictures represent the same bird as we are tracking it all along. I need some more time to "develope" more photographs of this one which, in a hope, to provide more information which leads to generation of a positive identification. BTW, IIRC, there was no call. It would be great if other members of that trip to KFBG could contribute more information. Regards, Griffin.
|
« Last Edit: Oct 24th, 2003, 2:56pm by Griffin » |
Logged |
|
|
|
miket
BBS Member BBS God
    
 I'd rather be birding!
Posts: 257
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #5 on: Oct 24th, 2003, 7:06pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Subsequent to my earlier posting, I was able to remind myself very well indeed of what exactly Radde's Warbler looks like when I had superb views of one at Mt. Austin this morning, and as a result I'd tend to say the photos are not of a Radde's - the super behind the eye is longer and finer, I don't think they usually show this pale throat effect, and the buff undertail coverts would be visible. My feeling now is that this is a Dusky, but I look forward to seeing more photos.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Griffin
BBS Member BBS God
    

Gender: 
Posts: 139
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #6 on: Oct 25th, 2003, 8:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Here are two more (sorry, they are not in HKBWS dimension) Again, they are not clear enough (especially colour) for I did not use any flash at all. Griffin.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Mike Turnbull
Guest

|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #7 on: Oct 26th, 2003, 8:31pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Yesterday, Saturday, I saw two more Radde's (calling all the time) at Sha Lo Tung, which sort of reminded me how exceptionally fresh and "yellow/green" the bird I saw at Mt Austin on Friday was. I've also taken the opportunity to look particularly closely at the Dusky's which have been hopping around on my lawn during this peak passage period. As a result, I'd go to back favouring Radde's, on supecilium shape in the first photo, and maybe super. length in the second, and on apparent "jizz" in the second. I'm afraid the additional shots don't seem to add much. Personally I'd suggest you submit as a Radde's attaching the first two photos. Mike Turnbull
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Mike Kilburn
Committee Member BBS Full Member
  

Posts: 32
|
 |
Re: Chinese Bush Warbler(?)
« Reply #8 on: Oct 26th, 2003, 10:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Dear Griffin and Mike Just make matters more confusing I have to say taht I agree with Mikes initial assessment that this is a Dusky Warbler. Why? a) The overall tone of the bird looks rather grey-brown instead of yellow-green. b) The shape of the bill - in your second photo is looks short but on the others it looks longer. However on neither pic does it look as if the upper mandible is srongly curved, as Radde's often shows. c) In the last picture especially the legs look rather skinny to me d) The undertail coverts look rather pale Its also worth remembering that most species (including some phylloscopus warblers - aiya!) do show lots of variation or abnormality and can be just about impossible!! Best is to keep looking at them, accept that some will escape from a firm idenification and and after a few years of practice more and more look typical and the odd ones and different species really stand out! Please note that I add my comments in the hope that we an all learn something - it would be great to get more comments. Cheers Mike K
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|