Author |
Topic: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬Ü®VöÈ (Read 1764 times) |
|
648
BBS Member BBS God
    


Posts: 439
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #3 on: Apr 5th, 2003, 8:30pm » |
Quote Modify
|
10Dµe½èªº½T¦³ÂI¯»¯»ªº.¤£ª¾¬OµJÂIÁÙ¬O¦â±mªºì¦]¡C
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
KK Hui
BBS Member BBS God
    

Bird Photography - at its best ...
Posts: 940
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #4 on: Apr 5th, 2003, 8:32pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Daniel & 648, Great shots of this little bird! I'm not sure how much post processing you both had done but 648's shots are obviously sharper and color is more vivid. Could this be the superior resolution the 1D as compared to 10D? If not, I suspect the 600IS is far better in terms of sharpness and color rendition. That really has me thinking now!!!!! Could I have some technical data such as iso setting, ss etc please ... 648: What is that tiny white dot on your pictures Best kk -------------- www.geocities.com/kkhui_001
|
« Last Edit: Apr 5th, 2003, 8:54pm by KK Hui » |
Logged |
|
|
|
648
BBS Member BBS God
    


Posts: 439
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #5 on: Apr 5th, 2003, 8:51pm » |
Quote Modify
|
KK, ¤W¹Ïªº¤p¥ÕÂI¬O¤@±ø»jµïµ·¤Wªº¤@ÂI,¤U¹Ïªº´N¤£ª¾¹D¤F¡I¤U¹Ï©ç¤F¨â±i,¨â±i³£¦³ ¥ÕÂI,¤µ¤Ñ©ç¶À¬ÜöÈ¥H¥~ªº³£¨S¦³.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Daniel CK Chan
BBS Member BBS God
    

I love nature photography!

Gender: 
Posts: 794
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #6 on: Apr 5th, 2003, 9:21pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 5th, 2003, 8:51pm, 648 wrote:KK, ¤W¹Ïªº¤p¥ÕÂI¬O¤@±ø»jµïµ·¤Wªº¤@ÂI,¤U¹Ïªº´N¤£ª¾¹D¤F¡I¤U¹Ï©ç¤F¨â±i,¨â±i³£¦³¥ÕÂI,¤µ¤Ñ©ç¶À¬ÜöÈ¥H¥~ªº³£¨S¦³. |
| kk, I have the white dots too but removed by PS. The original photo is generated by PS automate - web photo gallery. I have re-saved by "save for web" now. The info. of #1 is shown below. Shooting Date/Time 2003/4/5 PM 12:25:17 Shooting Mode Aperture-Priority AE Tv( Shutter Speed ) 1/320 Av( Aperture Value ) 5.6 Metering Mode Evaluative Exposure Compensation 0 ISO Speed 400 Regards Daniel
|
|
Logged |
Daniel CK Chan http://www.danielckchan.com
|
|
|
648
BBS Member BBS God
    


Posts: 439
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #7 on: Apr 5th, 2003, 9:30pm » |
Quote Modify
|
KK¡BDANIEL¥S¡G §Ú¤W¹Ï¬O1/125S,ev+1/3;¤U¹Ï1/320S,¨ä¥Lªº©MDANIEL¤@¼Ë¡C
|
« Last Edit: Apr 5th, 2003, 9:59pm by 648 » |
Logged |
|
|
|
KK Hui
BBS Member BBS God
    

Bird Photography - at its best ...
Posts: 940
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #8 on: Apr 6th, 2003, 8:59am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 5th, 2003, 9:30pm, 648 wrote:§Ú¤W¹Ï¬O1/125S,ev+1/3;¤U¹Ï1/320S,¨ä¥Lªº©MDANIEL¤@¼Ë¡C |
| Thank you both for the shooting info. I think even with IS activated, a ss of 1/320 ~ 1/125 sounds dangerously low to me for a subject that doesn't keep still. This bears out more in Daniel's images. I think using fill flash in this case may save the day ... Best kk ------------- www.geocities.com/kkhui_001
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Daniel CK Chan
BBS Member BBS God
    

I love nature photography!

Gender: 
Posts: 794
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #9 on: Apr 6th, 2003, 7:09pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 6th, 2003, 8:59am, KK Hui wrote: Thank you both for the shooting info. I think even with IS activated, a ss of 1/320 ~ 1/125 sounds dangerously low to me for a subject that doesn't keep still. This bears out more in Daniel's images. I think using fill flash in this case may save the day ... Best kk ------------- www.geocities.com/kkhui_001 |
| I have tried to use ff with EF2X, but the result is not good as the eye is too white to me Best
|
|
Logged |
Daniel CK Chan http://www.danielckchan.com
|
|
|
BERNARD
BBS Member BBS Senior Member
   
 I love bird watching!
Gender: 
Posts: 83
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #10 on: Apr 7th, 2003, 12:34pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hi Daniel & 648, Both of you take good clean pictures ! Did you both use hides to wait for the bird to approach very closed to you to take photos ? How close was the bird (how many feet) ? Did you both switch on noise reduction for ISO 400 ? I tried flash photos in Tai Po Kau with noise reduction at ISO 400 and the birds and background still always appear grainy and powdery. Probably my pictures are mostly underexposed (didn't have better beamer) and magnified too much (didn't use hide, so I am quite far away from those birds). I guess both of you use shutter wire to avoiding shaking. Awaiting your expert opinion. Bernard.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
648
BBS Member BBS God
    


Posts: 439
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #11 on: Apr 7th, 2003, 2:16pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Bernard, §ÚÌ¥u¬O¬ï¤W°g±m¦ç¦Ó¤w;¶ZÂ÷¦¹³¾¬ù8¦Ì(¥Ø´ú),µ¥Ô¤F¬ù2.5¤p®É,§Ú¥u©ç¨ì3±i¡I §Ú¤@¯ë¥Înoise reduction 2.(¨ä¹ê¥u¬O§Ñ°Ooff),§Úı±o©çÄá³¾Ãþ¥i¤À¬°¨â¤è±¡G¤@¬O©ç¨ì;¤G¬O©ç¦n.§Ó¦b©ç ¨ì´N¤£¥Î¦h»¡,n©ç¦nªº¸Ü§Úı±oÁÙ¬On¦h©ç¦h¥æ¬y(Bernard¥S¦n¹³«Ü¤Ö¶K¹Ï ).§Ú©çªL³¾ªº¸gÅç·¥¤Ö,¥u±qºô¤W±oª¾¦h¼Æ¦n§@«~¬O¥Ñ@¤ßµ¥Ô³¾¨à¥X²{¦b²z·Q¦ a¤è¦Ó¦¨(§Þ³N¬O¥²¶·ªº°Õ).Bernard¥S¥i¥H¦h¶K·Ó¤ù,¤j®a¦hÂI¥æ¬y§a¡I ¸
|
« Last Edit: Apr 7th, 2003, 2:19pm by 648 » |
Logged |
|
|
|
Peter Wong
Guest

|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #12 on: Apr 7th, 2003, 2:56pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Daniel & 648, Excellent photos, I'm quite jealous indeed. Can you tell me where I can find this lovely bird? Is it the path near the Great Crested Grebe?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Daniel CK Chan
BBS Member BBS God
    

I love nature photography!

Gender: 
Posts: 794
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #13 on: Apr 7th, 2003, 7:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 7th, 2003, 2:56pm, Peter Wong wrote: Daniel & 648, Excellent photos, I'm quite jealous indeed. Can you tell me where I can find this lovely bird? Is it the path near the Great Crested Grebe? |
| Peter, ¦b²D«F¥ªªñ,¬Q¤ÑÁÙ¨£¨e,¤µ¤Ñ¦b¦P¤@¦aÂIµ¥¤FÓ¦h¤p®É«o¥¼¨£ªÚÂÜ. Bernard,µ¥Ô®É¨ä¤¤¤@¶µnÀRÁn¡]©Î¤pÁn»¡¸Ü)¡A¤HÁn¥i¯à·|§â³¾À~¶]ªº 648, ¦h©ç§A¤T±i¡A¦ýEF2X+FFªº®ÄªG¤£¦n¡C Daniel
|
« Last Edit: Apr 7th, 2003, 7:47pm by Daniel CK Chan » |
Logged |
Daniel CK Chan http://www.danielckchan.com
|
|
|
³¾¤Í¢Ï(BWA)
Committee Member BBS God
    
 I love Nature!
Gender: 
Posts: 308
|
 |
Re: Narcissus Flycatcher ¶À¬ÜöÈ
« Reply #14 on: Apr 7th, 2003, 8:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 7th, 2003, 2:16pm, 648 wrote:Bernard, §ÚÌ¥u¬O¬ï¤W°g±m¦ç¦Ó¤w;¶ZÂ÷¦¹³¾¬ù8¦Ì(¥Ø´ú),µ¥Ô¤F¬ù2.5¤p®É,§Ú¥u©ç¨ì3±i¡I §Ú¤@¯ë¥Înoise reduction 2.(¨ä¹ê¥u¬O§Ñ°Ooff),§Úı±o©çÄá³¾Ãþ¥i¤À¬°¨â¤è±¡G¤@¬O©ç¨ì;¤G¬O©ç¦n.§Ó¦b©ç ¨ì´N¤£¥Î¦h»¡,n©ç¦nªº¸Ü§Úı±oÁÙ¬On¦h©ç¦h¥æ¬y(Bernard¥S¦n¹³«Ü¤Ö¶K¹Ï ).§Ú©çªL³¾ªº¸gÅç·¥¤Ö,¥u±qºô¤W±oª¾¦h¼Æ¦n§@«~¬O¥Ñ@¤ßµ¥Ô³¾¨à¥X²{¦b²z·Q¦ a¤è¦Ó¦¨(§Þ³N¬O¥²¶·ªº°Õ).Bernard¥S¥i¥H¦h¶K·Ó¤ù,¤j®a¦hÂI¥æ¬y§a¡I ¸ |
| 648¥S©Ò¨¥¤@ÂI¤£°²¡C¬Q¤Ñ¤E®É¦h¦b¦Ì®H«K¨£¨ì¥L©M¤Í¤H¡]¤£ª¾¬O§_Daniel Chan¥S¡^±a¦PºP´È¡A¦u¦b¦ÀÃä©ç»ñÀYøå(Ó¸³¾)¡A§Ṳ́U¤È¤T®ÉÂ÷¶}¡A¥LÌÁÙ¦b¨º¸Ì ¦uÔ¡I ÁöµM648´¿¦b4¤ë5¤é¤w¦b³o¸Ìµoªí¹L»ñÀYøå(Ó¸³¾)ªº·Ó¤ù¡A¦ý¬O¤´µMªÖªá®É¶¡ ®·®»§ó¨ÎªºÃèÀY¡A¯u¨ØªA¥L̪º«í¤ß©M@©Ê¡C 648¥S¡A¬Q¤Ñµn¥Xªº¶À¯Ý´¥¬³¾À³¬O·í¤Ñªº¦¨ªG¤§¤@§a¡A»ñÀYøå(Ó¸³¾)¤è±¤S¦³¨S ¦³ ¦¬Ã¬©O¡H
|
« Last Edit: Apr 7th, 2003, 9:00pm by ³¾¤Í¢Ï(BWA) » |
Logged |
|
|
|
|